Punitive Damages Reform: SB 482 (1995).
Requires 40% of punitive damages awards to be paid to
Requires 40% of punitive damages awards to be paid to the prevailing party, 60% to the state fund, and no more than 20% to the attorney of the prevailing party. Requires a plaintiff to show by “clear and convincing” evidence that a defendant “acted with malice or has shown a reckless and outrageous indifference to a highly unreasonable risk of harm and has acted with a conscious indifference to the health, safety and welfare of others.” Provides for court review of jury-awarded punitive damages. Bars the claiming of punitive damages in an original complaint. Requires a plaintiff to show a prima facie case for liability before amending a complaint to include a punitive damages claim. The split-recovery statute allocating 60% of punitive damages award to the state did not violate the right to a remedy, the right to a jury trial, the takings or tax provisions, or the separation of powers under the State Constitution.
Latest News
View all news
Reports Reveal Influence of Trial Lawyers on New Jersey’s Legal Landscape
Two New Reports Analyze Legal Services Advertising Trends and Campaign Contributions
California Trial Lawyers’ Influence on Legal Landscape Exposed
Two New Reports Unveil Disturbing Trends in Legal Services Advertising and Plaintiffs’ Firms’ Political Contributions
New Reports Expose Trial Lawyers’ Grip on Nevada Politics and Legal Advertising Trends
In-depth analysis unveils trial lawyers’ staggering advertising and political spending, exposing tactics used to shape public opinion and legal outcomes.
Explosive New Reports Uncover Shocking Trends in Legal Advertising and Campaign Contributions in New York State
ATRA’s Latest Reports Reveal the Deep Ties Between Trial Lawyers and New York Politics
New Rule 702 Helps Judges Keep Bad Science Out Of Court
Judges’ commitment to rigorous policing of science is paramount in safeguarding the integrity of the legal system.
A Call to Halt the Onslaught of Litigation Tourism
This isn’t just about legal technicalities; it’s about New Yorkers’ livelihoods and ability to make ends meet.