American Tort Reform Association - ATRAContactSearch

ATRA Home
Find Out About
HOME ATRA
Newsroom
State and Federal Reforms
Issues
Judicial Hellholes
Looney Lawsuits
How Lawsuit Abuse Affects Me
Legal Reform Champs
Tort Reform Works
Lawsuit Abuse Reform Coalition
Membership
Links
Foundation

Print this Page
Email Us

Indiana

 

INDIANA REFORMS

Appeal Bond Reform: HB 1204 (2002).  Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal punitive damages awards to $25 million.   

Collateral Source Rule Reform: SB 394 (1986): Ind. Code Ann. § 34-44-1-2.   Permits the admissibility of evidence of collateral source payments from sources other than life insurance, other insurance for which the plaintiff or members of the plaintiff’s family have paid directly, or payments made by the United States or any of its agencies or subdivisions.  Provides for awards to be offset at the court’s discretion.  Permits a court to instruct a jury to disregard tax consequences of its verdict.

Frivolous Lawsuit Sanction: SB 393 (1986).  Allows a court to assess court costs and attorneys’ fees for frivolous conduct.

Joint and Several Liability Reform: Ind. Code Ann.   § 34-51-2-8.  Bars application of the rule of joint and several liability in the recovery of all damages.

Jury Service Reform: S.B. 232 (2006).  Makes the following changes to improve the jury system: (1) provides a one-time    postponement to another date within one year upon a showing of hardship, extreme inconvenience, or necessity; (2) protects an individual called for jury service who provides reasonable notice to his or her employer from being subjected to adverse employment action; (3) prohibits employers from requiring or requesting employees to use annual leave for jury service.  In addition, the legislation eliminates automatic postponement from jury service including those for ferry-keepers and persons employed in attendance at such ferry, people age 65 and older, government officials, legislators, armed services, veterinarians, dentists, Indianapolis School Board members, and police and fire department members. 

Medical Liability Reform: Contingent Fee Reform: Ind. Code Ann. § 34-18-18-1.  Limits contingent fees in medical liability cases to 15% of the recovery that comes from the Patient’s Compensation Fund.  

Medical Liability Reform: Damages Limits: Ind. Code Ann.   § 34-18-14-3.  Limits the total amount recoverable in medical liability cases to $750,000 for acts that occur before July 1, 1999, and $1,250,000 for acts that occur after July 1, 1999.  Requires any amount awarded in excess of these limits to be paid from the Patient’s Compensation Fund.

Medical Liability Reform: Periodic Payment of Future Damages: Ind. Code Ann. § 34-18-14-4.  Permits, but does not require, a court to order the periodic payment of future damages in medical liability cases.

Medical Liability Reform: Punitive Damages: S.B. 0296 (2006).  Permits the Attorney General's office to negotiate and compromise the portion of a punitive damages award that is to be paid to the state. Provides that the state's interest in a punitive damages award is effective when a finder of fact announces a verdict that includes punitive damages.

Obesity Litigation Reform: H.B. 1113 (2006).  Exempts from civil liability manufacturers, producers, packers, distributors, carriers, holders, sellers, marketers, and advertisers of food (as defined in 21 U.S.C. 321 (f)) or an association of one or more such entities for claims arising out of weight gain, obesity, a health condition associated with weight gain or obesity, or other generally known conditions allegedly caused or likely to result from the long-term consumption of food.  The liability exemption does not apply if the claim is based on a material violation of a state or federal adulteration or misbranding requirement.  The liability exemption also does not apply for any other material violation of federal or state law applicable to the manufacturing, marketing, distribution, advertising, labeling or sale of food and the violation was committed knowingly and willfully.

Product Liability Reform: HB 1741 (1995).  Bars application of the rule of joint and several liability in product liability cases.  Provides a rebuttable presumption that a product is not defective if: (1) the manufacturer of the product conformed with recognized “state of the art” safety guidelines; or (2) the manufacturer of the product complied with government standards (i.e. approved by FDA, FAA etc...).  Restricts strict liability actions to the manufacturer of the product.

Punitive Damages Reform: HB 1741 (1995): Ind. Code Ann. § 34-51-3-4.  Limits the award of punitive damages to the greater of three times the award of compensatory damages or $50,000.  Requires 75% of punitive damage awards to be paid to the state fund.




© 2007 American Tort Reform Association