OKLAHOMA REFORMS

Appeal Bond Reform: SB 372 (2001).  Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to $25 million.  

Joint and Several Liability Reform: H.B. 2661 (2004).  Restricts joint liability to only a defendant that is more than 50 percent at fault, except where any defendant acted with willful and wanton conduct or reckless disregard and then all defendants may be held joint and severably liable.  Limitation only applies when the plaintiff has no comparative negligence.

Joint and Several Liability Reform: Anderson v. O’Donohue, 677 P.2d 648 (Okla. 1983). Laubach v. Morgan, 588 P.2d 1071 (Okla. 1978).  Bars application of the rule of joint and several liability in the award of all damages if the plaintiff was at fault.

Jury Service Reform: S.B. 479 (2004).  Provides jurors the right to automatically postpone service one time.  Reduces the length of service from a two-week term to no more than one day unless selected to serve on a jury.  Limits jury service to once every two years.  Creates a lengthy trial fund which compensates jurors up to $200 per day, starting on the eleventh day of service – the fund is to be financed by a $10 filing fee on all civil cases.  Provides jurors employment protections by prohibiting employers from penalizing jurors who serve.  Provides small business protections by allowing an employee of a small business to differ service if another employee from the same firm is already serving in the same period.  Increases penalties for no-shows. 

Medical Liability Reform/Volunteer Legal Protection: S.B. 930 (2007) Allows charitable health care providers rendering professional services gratuitously to be exempt from legal liability.

Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: H.B. 2661 (2004).  Limits noneconomic damages to $300,000 in medical liability cases provided the defendant made an offer of judgment and the amount of the   verdict is less than one-and-a-half times the amount of the final offer of judgment.  Indexes the limit to inflation.  Non-economic damages do not include, by definition, exemplary damages.  Limit on noneconomic damages  may be lifted if nine or more members of the jury find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant committed negligence or if nine or more members of the jury find by a preponderance of the evidence that the conduct of the defendant was willful or wanton.  Provides,     however, that the judge must, before submitting such determination to the jury, make a threshold determination that there is evidence from which the jury could reasonably make the findings set forth in the case.  Provides that if the jury returns a verdict that is greater than $300,000 but less than         one-and-a-half times the amount of the final offer of judgment, the court shall submit additional forms of possible verdicts to the jury covering possible determinations of negligence and/or willful and wanton conduct.     Provides that limits do not apply to wrongful death action.  Provisions of this section sunsets on November 1, 2010.

Medical Liability Reform: Ob/gyn’s and emergency care: Noneconomic Damages Reform: H.B. 2661 (2004).  Extends the sunset provision on the limit on noneconomic damages for ob/gyn’s and emergency care situations (S.B. 629, 2003) from July 1, 2008 until November 1, 2010.

Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: SB 629 (2003).  Limits noneconomic damages to $350,000 in cases involving pregnancy (labor, delivery, and post partum period) as well as emergency care.

Medical Liability Reform: Certificate of Merit Requirement: SB 629 (2003).  Requires a certificate of merit to be filed with the petition.

Medical Liability Reform: Collateral Source Rule Reform: SB 629 (2003).  Permits the admissibility of evidence of collateral source payments.

Medical Liability Reform: Pre-judgment Interest Rate Reform: SB 629 (2003).  In medical liability cases, ties the prejudgment interest rate to the average U.S. Treasury Rate of the preceding calendar year.

Medical Liability Reform: Contingent Fee Reform: Okla. Stat. Ann. tit.5, § 7.  Limits contingent fees to 50% of a plaintiff’s recovery.

Prejudgment and Postjudgment Interest Rate Reform: H.B. 2661 (2004).  Sets postjudgment and prejudgment interest rate at the prime rate plus 2 percent (effective January 1, 2005).

Prejudgment Interest Reform: SB 488 (1986).  Prohibits the assessment of prejudgment interest on punitive damage awards.  Sets the prejudgment interest rate at 4% above the U.S. Treasury Bill. 

Punitive Damages Reform: SB 263 (1995): Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 9.1.  Codifies factors that the jury must consider in awarding punitive damages.  Provides that when a jury finds by “clear and convincing” evidence that the defendant: (1) acted in “reckless disregard for the rights of others,” the award is limited to the greater of $100,000 or actual damages awarded; or (2) acted intentionally and with malice, the award is limited to $500,000; two times the award of actual damages; or the increased financial benefit derived by the defendant or insurer as a direct result of the conduct causing injury.  The limit does not apply if the court finds evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted intentionally and with malice in conduct life‑threatening to humans.

Punitive Damages Reform: SB 488 (1986).  Limits the award of punitive damages to the award of compensatory damages unless the plaintiff establishes her case by “clear and convincing” evidence, in which case no limit applies.