|
Legal
Reform - January/February 2004 Michigan Forward
The Seven Myths of Highly Effective Plaintiff's Lawyers
By Steven B. Hantler
To understand the genesis of America's legal crisis, we
must look beyond the $2 million car paint jobs and cups of spilled coffee. We
must examine the deeper currents of American culture in which lawsuits have
become our society's principal drama, the way Westerns once were.
America's culture - saturated in the drama of the law -
is in danger of forsaking the rule of law. To understand why, we need to
address seven fictions the trial bar uses to change our culture and exploit the
law. These are The Seven Myths of Highly Effective Plaintiff's Lawyers.
The 1st Myth is that corporations put
profits ahead of safety and honesty, and large damage awards are the only way
to get corporations to act responsibly.
The truth is that most corporations care deeply about the
safety of their customers. That is the only way to do business in the modern
world. But do profits and costs enter into manufacturing decisions? Of course
they do.
Consider the auto industry. The truth is we could make a vehicle impervious to
just about any kind of accident. In fact, such a vehicle is available. It is called an
Abrams tank-it weighs close to 70 tons, and costs more than $4 million. The
consumer, however, does not want tanks.
The 2nd
Myth is that the so-called "liability crisis" is an invention of corporations
to limit their liability for wrongdoing.
A Tillinghast Towers-Perrin study reveals the U.S. tort system cost
$205 billion in 2001. This amounts to $721 for every man, woman and child in
the country and is an astonishing 14 percent increase in tort costs since 2000.
The President's Council of Economic Advisors reported that the cost of lawsuits
is "far more than enough money to solve Social Security's long-term financing
crisis."
The 3rd
Myth is that punitive damages are rarely awarded or are always reduced on
appeal.
If awards were so rare, why would plaintiff's lawyers
waste their time pleading them in every case? Why would they fight reasonable
limits on punitive awards?
The answer: Settlement leverage. As Yale Law School
Professor George Priest has observed, "the availability of unlimited punitive
damages affects 95 percent to 98 percent of cases that settle out of court
prior to trial. It is obvious and indisputable that a punitive damage claim
increases the magnitude of the ultimate settlement and, increases
likelihood of litigation."
The 4th
Myth is that class action lawsuits serve the public good by marrying efficiency
with justice.
A Florida judge wrote of one lawsuit that it "appears to be
the class litigation equivalent of the 'squeegee boys' who used to frequent
major urban intersections and who would run up to a stopped car, splash soapy
water on its perfectly clean windshield and expect payment for the uninvited
service of wiping it off." While some judges are now starting to reject these
suits, it only takes one judge to bring a defendant to its knees.
The 5th Myth is that litigation protects
consumers when regulators fail to act.
In the federal regulatory process, safety policy is
developed by a balanced, expert-led investigation of risks. Federal auto safety
investigators and scientists want to know all the pertinent facts affecting
vehicle safety. In the tort process, the investigative process is anything but
scientific. In 29 states, for example, juries are not allowed to hear that an
injured plaintiff failed to wear a seatbelt. Incredibly, the fact that the
driver at fault was drunk or drove through a red light is not admissible in
many courts.
The 6th Myth is closest to my everyday
practice - the myth that corporations settle lawsuits to cover up their
wrongdoing.
I don't need to spend a lot of time responding to this Myth.
Plaintiff's lawyer Dick Scruggs actually provides the best response:
"The trial lawyers have established relationships with the
judges that are elected ... They've got large populations of voters who are in on
the deal ... and it's almost impossible to get a fair trial if you're a
defendant in some of these places."
The 7th and Final Myth of Highly Effective
Plaintiff's Lawyers is that like David-against-Goliath, the trial lawyers are
outgunned by powerful and resourceful corporations.
This is the most cherished trial lawyer myth, perpetuated in
countless movies, that there are a few Robin Hoods out there struggling against
the armed might of the powerful Sheriff. But Robin Hood, after all, gave to the poor. Six trial lawyers and their firms
took more than $5 billion as fees for their firms from tobacco litigation -
monies that many believe belong in state treasuries for health care and
education.
If you want to dig deeper into the legal crisis, the full text of
this speech is available on the Michigan Chamber's website at www.michamber.com.
Steven
B. Hantler is Assistant General Counsel for Government and Regulation for
DaimlerChrysler Corporation and is a member of the Board of Directors of the
Michigan Chamber of Commerce.
|