Public nuisance laws have no place in product liability determinations
Public nuisance is a legal argument originally intended to address issues involving land use and public spaces. However, profit-motivated trial lawyers have pushed to expand this concept far beyond its original scope, finding success in certain jurisdictions.
This op-ed was originally published by the Cleveland Plain Dealer.
A Dec. 10, 2024, Ohio Supreme Court decision marks a significant victory for a balanced civil justice system and common sense. The Court hit the brakes on lawsuit abuse when it ruled that Ohio’s product liability law doesn’t allow for public nuisance claims to address the opioid crisis.
The court’s Trumbull County v. Purdue Pharma decision overturns a verdict awarding $650 million to Trumbull and Lake counties in an opioid-related lawsuit. While the opioid epidemic undoubtedly is a serious public health issue that deserves our full attention, attempting to use public nuisance law to address it is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.
Read the full piece in the Cleveland Plain Dealer here.
Keep In Touch
Latest News
View all news
Groups Urge Congressional Scrutiny of D.C. Attorney General’s Use of Private Attorneys
Concerns Mount Over Outside Counsel Contracts and Litigation Agendas
America’s $367 Billion Lawsuit Epidemic
The Hidden Tax Crushing Families and Businesses
$745 Million Verdict in Coastal Litigation Exemplifies Louisiana’s ‘Judicial Hellhole®’ Status
Excessive Litigation Costs Residents $1,011 Annually and Jeopardizes 40,000 Jobs Each Year
Alarming Expansion in Public Nuisance Litigation Revealed by ATRA Report
From Social Media to Car Thefts, New Litigation Trends Threaten Entire Industries
Georgia Legislature Passes Landmark Tort Reform Bill
ATRA Applauds Passage, Anticipates Governor’s Signature on SB 68
The trial lawyer playbook: How aggressive advertising and junk science are costing Californians
In 2024, legal services ads hit $164 million in LA, part of a 39% national rise, fueling aggressive marketing, third-party funding, and straining California’s economy and courts.