American Tort Reform Association - ATRAContactSearch

ATRA Home
Find Out About
HOME ATRA
Newsroom
State and Federal Reforms
Issues
Judicial Hellholes
How Lawsuit Abuse Affects Me
Tort Reform Works
Lawsuit Abuse Reform Coalition
Membership
Links
Foundation

Print this Page
Email Us

North Carolina

 

NORTH CAROLINA REFORMS

Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediation: SB 791 (1991); Amended N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-38.  Establishes pilot programs to require mediation of civil actions, including medical liability lawsuits.

Appeal Bond Reform: SB 33 (2011).  The amount of the undertaking that shall be required by the court shall be an amount determined by the court after notice and hearing proper and reasonable for the security of the rights of the adverse party, considering relevant factors, including the following: (1) The amount of the judgment; (2) the amount of the limits of all applicable liability policies of the appellant judgment debtor; and (3) The aggregate net worth of the appellant judgment debtor.

Appeal Bond Reform: SB 784 (2003); Amended N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-289.  Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to $25 million regardless of legal theory.  Provides that foreign judgments cannot be executed in North Carolina if appeal is pending in a foreign jurisdiction or the judgment has been stayed by the court that rendered it and a bond has been posted.

Appeal Bond Reform: SB 2 (2000); Amended N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1C-1750.  Places a $25 million limit on bond requirements in punitive damages awards during the appeal process.  Provides that limits on bond appeals for out-of-state judgments apply during the stay period only.

Attorneys Fees in Small Cases: HB 542 (2011).  Limits attorneys fees to $10,000 in cases brought against an insurance company in which the plaintiff is the insured or beneficiary, and the amount of damages recovered is $20,000 or less.  This restores the original intent of the statute which was to encourage parties to negotiate reasonable settlements and reduce litigation.

Expert Witness Reform: HB 542 (2011).  Increases the standards for admitting expert witness testimony and evidence.

Medical Liability Reform: Bifurcation of Trials: SB 33 (2011).  Upon motion of any party in an action in tort wherein the plaintiff seeks damages exceeding $150,000, the court shall order separate trials for the issue of liability and the issue of damages, unless the court for good cause shown orders a single trial.  Evidence relating solely to compensatory damages shall not be admissible until the trier of fact has determined that the defendant is liable.  The same trier of fact that tries the issues relating to liability shall try the issues relating to damages."

Medical Liability Reform: Expert Review: SB 33 (2011).  Current North Carolina law requires a plaintiff to have an expert witness who is qualified and willing to testify that there was a deviation in the standard of care in order for a case to proceed.  S.B. 33 requires such expert witnesses to review all reasonably available medical records in making such a determination rather than relying on hypothetical scenarios.

Medical Liability Reform: Good Samaritan Protection: HB 425 (1991); Amended N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-21.14.  Expands the 1989 Good Samaritan statute, which included only volunteer physician immunity for free emergency services at local health department facilities or non-profit community health centers, to protect all individuals volunteering services at these sites.

Medical Liability Reform: Non-emergency Care: SB 33 (2011).  Provides that in any medical malpractice action arising out of the provision of emergency services, the health care provider shall not be liable for the payment of damages unless it is found that the care provided was not in accordance with the standards of practice among members of the same health care profession with similar training and experience situated in the same or similar communities under the same or similar circumstances at the time of the alleged act giving rise to the cause of action.

Medical Liability Reform: Emergency Care: SB 33 (2011).  Provides that in the treatment of an emergency medical condition, as defined in 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd(e)(1)(A), the claimant must prove a violation of the standards of practice by clear and convincing evidence.

Medical Liability Reform: Noneconomic Damages Reform: SB 33 (2011).  Limits noneconomic damages in medical liability cases to $500,000 against all defendants.  The limit is subject to adjustments, every three years starting on January 1, 2014, based on the Consumer Price Index.  The legislation does provide for an exception to the limit if: (1) the plaintiff suffered disfigurement, loss of use of part of the body, permanent injury or death; and (2) the defendant's acts or failures, which are the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries, were committed in reckless disregard of the rights of others, grossly negligent, fraudulent, intentional or with malice.

Medical Liability Reform: Statute of Limitations for Actions by Minors or on Minor’s Behalf: SB 33 (2011).  Provides that an action may be brought at any time prior to a minor’s 10th birthday.  For minors ruled to be abused or neglected, then the action must be commenced within three

years of such judgment or consent order or before the minor reaches his/her 10th birthday – whichever is later.  For minors in the custody of the state, county or child placing agency, the action must be brought one year post-custody or before the minor’s 10th birthday – whichever is later.

Phantom Damages Reform: HB 542 (2011).  Requires that juries be given accurate information about the medical bills actually paid.

Product Liability Reform: HB 637 (1995); Amended N.C. Gen. Stat. § 99B-1.1.  Provides that there shall be no strict liability in tort for product liability actions.  Provides statutory defenses to product liability claims, including assumption of the risk.

Punitive Damages Reform: HB 729 (1995): N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 10-15(b), 1D‑25.  Limits the award of punitive damages to the greater of three times the award of compensatory damages or $250,000, unless the defendant caused the injury by driving while impaired.  Requires a plaintiff to show by “clear and convincing” evidence that a defendant was liable for compensatory damages and acted with fraud, malice, willful or wanton conduct.  Requires the determination of awards for punitive damages to be made in a separate proceeding at the request of the defendant.  The statute limiting punitive damages awards to the greater of three times compensatory damages or $250,000 did not violate the right to a jury trial, separation of powers principle, open courts guarantee, prohibition against special legislation, or the principles of due process, equal protection or the right to enjoy the fruits of one’s labor under the State Constitution, and was not void for vagueness.  Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp., 2002 WL 553461 (N.C. App. Apr. 16, 2002). 

Trespasser Liability Reform: HB 542 (2011).  Codifies North Carolina common law to make clear that land possessors are not liable for harm to trespassers on their property.




© 2007 American Tort Reform Association