ATRA Cheers SCOTUS Term’s Jurisdiction-Case ‘Trifecta’
WASHINGTON, D.C., June 19, 2017 – With today’s announced decision of a third significant jurisdictional case by the U.S. Supreme Court this term, the American Tort Reform Association applauded the […]
WASHINGTON, D.C., June 19, 2017 – With today’s announced decision of a third significant jurisdictional case by the U.S. Supreme Court this term, the American Tort Reform Association applauded the “trifecta,” calling the decisions “welcomed relief for corporate defendants targeted by personal injury lawyers, with plenty of help by plaintiff-friendly courts in California, Montana, Texas and elsewhere.”
ATRA president Tiger Joyce observed that, “For too long, too many lower courts have encouraged ‘litigation tourism’ by ignoring both ample Supreme Court precedent and corporate defendants’ Fourteenth Amendment right to due process.
“For seven decades the high court has made it clear that only lawsuits filed where a plaintiff resides or was injured, or where a defendant is headquartered or does much of its business comply with the Constitution,” Joyce continued. “Yet some lower courts have continually sought to invent new ways around this body of precedent intended to keep plaintiffs’ lawyers from dragging corporate defendants across the country and forcing them to defend themselves in what ATRA calls ‘Judicial Hellholes.’”
Today’s 8-1 decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California for San Francisco County makes clear that state courts have no jurisdiction over plainly out-of-state defendants being sued by out-of-state plaintiffs for injuries that allegedly occurred out-of-state.
“It is particularly encouraging that the court is strongly unified in these important decisions,” Joyce said, referring to another 8-1 decision in BNSF Railway Company v. Tyrell and a unanimous 8-0 decision in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, both announced last month.
“ATRA members hope that the high court majority’s message will settle this issue once and for all, and that the justices won’t hesitate to rebuke promptly those state judges who refuse to get with the program,” he concluded.
The American Tort Reform Association, based in Washington, D.C., is the only national organization dedicated exclusively to tort and liability reform through public education and the enactment of legislation. Its members include nonprofit organizations and small and large companies, as well as trade, business and professional associations from the state and national level. The American Tort Reform Foundation is a sister organization dedicated primarily to research and public education.
New Poll Finds Strong Bipartisan Support for Government Action vs. Litigation When it Comes to Handling the COVID-19 Pandemic
While COVID-19 relief efforts stall in Congress, public support for aid to small businesses and others impacted by the pandemic remains high. According to a new survey released today by […]
Missouri Supreme Court declines to review billion-dollar award against Johnson & Johnson baby powder
Juliette Fairley of the St. Louis Record reports on the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision not to review a $2 billion verdict.
ATRA President Tiger Joyce penned an op-ed for Law360 on the surge of COVID-19-related lawsuits targeting the insurance industry.
ATRA praises the passage of HB 6030 in Michigan, enacting COVID-19 liability protections.
ATRA’s statement on the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s ruling in Hammons v. Ethicon to allow an out-of-state lawsuit to continue, openly defying SCOTUS precedent.