North Carolina AG Candidates Fail To Embrace Government Transparency
ATRA reports North Carolina attorney general candidates’ inaction on transparency code pledge.
The major party candidates vying for the office of attorney general in North Carolina do not support good-government principles, the American Tort Reform Association reports.
Neither incumbent Attorney General Josh Stein (D) nor Republican candidate, Jim O’Neill, agreed to sign ATRA’s Attorney General Transparency Code pledge, the 2020 State Attorney General Candidate Questionnaire.
“We are disappointed North Carolina voters do not have an attorney general candidate committed to common sense transparency standards,” ATRA President Tiger Joyce said. “However, there is still time before the election and we urge both incumbent AG Josh Stein and his opponent Jim O’Neill to sign the pledge and demonstrate that, if elected, they can indeed commit to transparent, accountable government.”
ATRA developed the Transparency Code as a collection of model policies to govern the use of outside counsel by state attorneys general. Attorneys general play a critical role in creating a fairer system for all as their state’s head law enforcement officers.
Twenty-three states, including North Carolina, have passed laws that reflect principles of the Transparency Code. North Carolina enacted legislation in 2014 to prohibit state agencies from contracting with a private attorney unless the AG states the contingency fee representation is both cost-effective and in the public interest. The legislation includes additional transparency efforts including requiring the private attorneys to submit a request for proposal and a limit on attorneys fees.
“We hope to build on these best practices with North Carolina’s next AG to ensure these important reforms are upheld in 2021 and beyond,” Joyce said.
Increasing government transparency and reducing excessive litigation are critical aspects of enhancing a state’s economic development climate and growing job opportunities. ATRA works with state and local leaders to continually improve our civil justice system.
“In every instance, a state’s attorney general should seek to provide the highest quality services at the best value for hardworking taxpayers when considering whether to contract with outside counsel,” Joyce said. “Signing ATRA’s Transparency Code is critical to bringing greater transparency and accountability to the Office of Attorney General in North Carolina.”
Attorneys general need the discretion and independence to enforce state law, free from the influence of parties that may have a private interest in the outcome of any litigation their office may take on.
For more information about ATRA’s work in creating greater transparency among state attorneys general, please visit AGSunshine.com.
Want more updates on civil justice reform? Sign up for ATRA’s occasional email updates.
Latest News
View all news
Congressional Hearing on Bankruptcy to Address Mass Tort Litigation
ATRA Reiterates Support for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Use to Address Mass Tort Litigation, Urges Meaningful Dialogue Amid Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing
Climate Lawsuits Don’t Belong In State Courts
By maintaining the clear distinction between the judiciary and policymaking, the court can help us navigate this critical issue with prudence and responsibility, safeguarding a sustainable future for all.
House Oversight Hearing on Third-Party Litigation Financing Applauded by ATRA
The lack of oversight and transparency around third-party litigation funding threatens the integrity of our legal system
Georgia Legislature Needs to Address Lawsuit Abuses
Together, let’s forge a legal landscape that makes equitable access to justice a living reality for all Georgians.
Private Attorneys Hired by State Should Not Reap a Windfall at Taxpayers’ Expense
This is an opportunity to reassess the practices and regulations surrounding private-attorney contracting and to enact reforms that promote fairness, transparency and value for taxpayer dollars.
ATRA Applauds 4th Circuit’s Denial of En Banc Review in Bestwall Litigation
Allowing the company to continue the bankruptcy process will help ensure equitable and efficient resolution in complex mass tort claims