Profit-Driven Lawyers Deter Comprehensive Solutions for Opioid Crisis
Lawyers who are driven by potential winnings and settlements threaten to frustrate efforts to resolve litigation over the opioid epidemic, lessening the likelihood of achieving a meaningful resolution
This op-ed was originally published by Bloomberg Law.
On Jan. 14, New Mexico became the latest state to join a nationwide settlement with Johnson & Johnson and other opioid makers. The company agreed to pay the state $44 million to resolve claims that it fueled the opioid epidemic through its marketing practices.
Also, states joined together to urge California courts to dismiss complaints filed by local governments, arguing that the municipality complaints undermine the states’ roles in the opioid multi-district litigation (MDL).
The MDL, comprised of more than 1,000 cases, concerns another national crisis which has been backburnered during the Covid-19 pandemic—the country’s opioid epidemic.
Opioid abuse has resulted in enormous human and economic costs, as state attorneys general who have reached settlements aimed at combating the epidemic and alleviating its harms have stated.
However, the master complaints filed in this MDL by hundreds of political subdivisions of states that have already settled with the same defendant as well as major pharmacies threaten to frustrate—not further—efforts to resolve litigation over the opioid epidemic, lessening the likelihood of achieving meaningful resolution.
These follow-on complaints, along with duplicative municipal litigation against all these businesses, risk usurping the states’ traditional authority to act in the interests of their citizens. Allowing the municipality complaints to proceed will harm not just the settling parties but the prospects of resolution for future MDLs—and the administration of justice itself.
Read the full op-ed from Bloomberg Law at news.bloomberglaw.com.
Want more updates on civil justice reform? Sign up for ATRA’s occasional email updates.
Latest News
View all news
ATRA Praises Texas Lawmakers for Moving Meaningful Tort Reform
SB 30 Aims to Lower Costs, Support Job Growth
ATRA Urges DeSantis Veto of H.B. 6017 to Protect Florida’s Civil Justice Gains
Bill Would Expand Litigation, Risk Returning State to ‘Judicial Hellhole’
ATRA Statement on Colorado HB 1291: Lawmakers Should Reject Bill That Would Fuel Lawsuit Abuse
State Risks ‘Lawsuit Inferno’ Status
Gov. Kemp Signs Major Tort Reform Bills in ‘Judicial Hellhole’ Georgia
ATRA Lauds New Laws Addressing Phantom Damages, Litigation Financing and More
Groups Urge Congressional Scrutiny of D.C. Attorney General’s Use of Private Attorneys
Concerns Mount Over Outside Counsel Contracts and Litigation Agendas
America’s $367 Billion Lawsuit Epidemic
The Hidden Tax Crushing Families and Businesses