Profit-Driven Lawyers Deter Comprehensive Solutions for Opioid Crisis
Lawyers who are driven by potential winnings and settlements threaten to frustrate efforts to resolve litigation over the opioid epidemic, lessening the likelihood of achieving a meaningful resolution
This op-ed was originally published by Bloomberg Law.
On Jan. 14, New Mexico became the latest state to join a nationwide settlement with Johnson & Johnson and other opioid makers. The company agreed to pay the state $44 million to resolve claims that it fueled the opioid epidemic through its marketing practices.
Also, states joined together to urge California courts to dismiss complaints filed by local governments, arguing that the municipality complaints undermine the states’ roles in the opioid multi-district litigation (MDL).
The MDL, comprised of more than 1,000 cases, concerns another national crisis which has been backburnered during the Covid-19 pandemic—the country’s opioid epidemic.
Opioid abuse has resulted in enormous human and economic costs, as state attorneys general who have reached settlements aimed at combating the epidemic and alleviating its harms have stated.
However, the master complaints filed in this MDL by hundreds of political subdivisions of states that have already settled with the same defendant as well as major pharmacies threaten to frustrate—not further—efforts to resolve litigation over the opioid epidemic, lessening the likelihood of achieving meaningful resolution.
These follow-on complaints, along with duplicative municipal litigation against all these businesses, risk usurping the states’ traditional authority to act in the interests of their citizens. Allowing the municipality complaints to proceed will harm not just the settling parties but the prospects of resolution for future MDLs—and the administration of justice itself.
Read the full op-ed from Bloomberg Law at news.bloomberglaw.com.
Want more updates on civil justice reform? Sign up for ATRA’s occasional email updates.
Latest News
View all news
America’s Top 9 Worst Judicial Hellholes®
Left unchecked, these jurisdictions will continue dragging down economic growth and undermining justice through rampant lawsuit abuse.
ATRA Commends J&J’s Plan to Resolve Notorious Talc Lawsuits
Claimants Given Opportunity to Vote on Plan; Judge to Reconsider Scientific Validity of Plaintiffs’ Experts
The Lab Whose Junk Science Is Fueling a Frenzy of Litigation
Legitimate consumer protection demands sound science and impartial analysis — not distorted data designed to manufacture lawsuits.
Lawsuit Advertising Frenzy Fuels Georgia’s Litigation Epidemic
Law Firms Spent $168M+ on 2.2M Ads in Georgia
Trial Lawyers’ Dual Grip on Pennsylvania Politics and Public Opinion Revealed in New ATRA Reports
ATRA’s Latest Studies Reveal Financial Influence and Lack of Transparency in Pennsylvania’s Campaign Finance Systems
Reports Reveal Influence of Trial Lawyers on New Jersey’s Legal Landscape
Two New Reports Analyze Legal Services Advertising Trends and Campaign Contributions