The Louisiana Supreme Court’s Alarming U-turn
The Pelican State deserves a judicial system that stands firmly on principles — not one swayed by the most recent political winds.
August 11, 2022 (WASHINGTON) – Today, a Federal Magistrate Judge in the U.S. Eastern District Court of Michigan declared a mistrial after a jury convened in good faith and could […]
August 11, 2022 (WASHINGTON) – Today, a Federal Magistrate Judge in the U.S. Eastern District Court of Michigan declared a mistrial after a jury convened in good faith and could not reach a decision in the civil trial against two engineering companies that conducted testing after the Flint water contamination in 2014.
Statement from American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) President Tiger Joyce:
“Today’s decision to declare a mistrial proves that costly and time-consuming litigation primarily benefits trial lawyers and not the people of Flint, Michigan. Despite this bellwether trial lasting seven months, plaintiffs’ attorneys involved in previous Flint water settlements have already indicated plans for another costly civil trial in order to score a massive payday for themselves. The statements made today by plaintiffs’ attorneys are irresponsible and demonstrate that they believe the purpose of our civil justice system is not to find liability but rather to destroy a business.
“These same attorneys were involved in the original $626 million Flint water settlement, where trial lawyers took home almost one third of the settlement in legal fees. This latest case is another clear example of how unscrupulous litigators utilize their trial lawyer playbook to exploit victims to enrich themselves—by targeting anyone with deep pockets. While ATRA is still concerned about future litigation, we must respect today’s decision, whether we agree with it or not.
“From the beginning in 2014, the crisis in Flint has required leaders to seek creative solutions to address these problems and provide needed support to those who were injured through no fault of their own. We still need these leaders—not profit-seeking lawyers—to step up and serve the public interest by addressing the needs of those who truly suffered in Flint. The civil justice system is not equipped to meet the needs of the public in this matter.”
Additional Background:
In February, U.S. District Court Judge Judith E. Levy approved a historic $626 million settlement related to the Flint water crisis. Trial lawyers walked away with nearly $200 million in legal fees—almost one third of the $626 million settlement paid by the State of Michigan—while victims on average received a $4,500 payout.
ATRA’s Tiger Joyce also penned an op-ed earlier this month, shining a light on how this latest flint water trial was unlikely to result in help for the victims.
###
The Pelican State deserves a judicial system that stands firmly on principles — not one swayed by the most recent political winds.
Judges must recognize these cases for what they are: a cynical attempt to turn the suffering of families into a litigation jackpot.
A recent Delaware case shows that not all states follow the Supreme Court’s 1993 Daubert ruling.
Republican Candidate Derek Brown Urged to Sign Pledge
Maryland taxpayers should be assured that state leadership is working in their best interests and not those of entrepreneurial trial lawyers.
ATRA Declares State a ‘Lawsuit Inferno’ Amid Liability Onslaught