Florida Lawmakers Pass Landmark Legal Reform
HB 837 heads to Governor’s desk
The American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) is disappointed to learn that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled against LTL Management, LLC in a case regarding the […]
The American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) is disappointed to learn that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled against LTL Management, LLC in a case regarding the company’s bankruptcy proceedings.
“This is a major setback for LTL Management and a blow to the fight to create a fairer process for all,” ATRA President Tiger Joyce said.
LTL Management, like many businesses, was facing financial distress caused by an onslaught of mass tort litigation and sought relief through the bankruptcy process. However, some parties sought to block the proceedings, arguing that LTL Management should not be allowed to use bankruptcy as a means of resolving its financial difficulties. The Third Circuit’s ruling prevents LTL Management from moving forward with its bankruptcy proceedings and seeking a fair and just resolution to its financial challenges.
“We are disappointed with the Third Circuit’s decision in this case,” Joyce said. “Allowing businesses like LTL Management to use the bankruptcy process is essential to ensuring a balanced legal system. This ruling is a setback not only for LTL Management, but for all businesses seeking relief through the bankruptcy process.”
In August 2022, ATRA filed a joint amicus brief with the U.S. Chamber Litigation Center in In re LTL Management, LLC before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The brief highlighted why the use of bankruptcy to address litigation claims is a valid bankruptcy purpose that has been historically recognized by courts across the country. Resolution of mass-tort liabilities in bankruptcy court has been a key tool for U.S. businesses since the Bankruptcy Code was first enacted in 1978.
“We are disappointed that LTL’s bankruptcy proceedings were blocked today,” Joyce said. “This ruling will risk fair and efficient resolution for current and future claims in this matter. Blocking the legitimate use of the Chapter 11 system was motivated by trial lawyers’ continued desire to file cases in a flawed system in which they’ve come to expect high-dollar awards, low evidentiary standards, and low barriers of entry. The financial motivations of the trial bar should not be prioritized above the needs of those operating in good faith.”
HB 837 heads to Governor’s desk
This letter-to-the-editor was originally published by the Tampa Bay Times in response to their March 13, 2023 article “Florida lawmakers want to help insurance companies by limiting lawsuits.“ The “tort […]
Our civil justice system is intended to resolve issues among parties & provide clarity on the law. But in this situation, the 3rd Circuit failed to do either.
American Tort Reform Association leads on advocating for transparency in damages in civil cases
This op-ed was originally published by Real Clear Policy. There’s a growing chorus of criticism against the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) for the organization’s perceived political bias and […]
Over 40,000 claimants have been relegated to an overburdened and inefficient civil justice system.