Lawyers Win Big From J&J Bankruptcy Decision
Over 40,000 claimants have been relegated to an overburdened and inefficient civil justice system.
This letter-to-the-editor was originally published by the Wall Street Journal.
In his letter “Johnson & Johnson Was Abusing Bankruptcy” (Feb. 9), Prof. Adam Levitin fails to mention the underlying opinion of Chief Judge Michael Kaplan of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey. Judge Kaplan found that the creation of LTL Management to handle J&J’s talc liabilities was “unquestionably a proper purpose under the Bankruptcy Code.” Like Mr. Levitin, Judge Kaplan has labored for years almost exclusively in the bankruptcy field.
Faced with tens of thousands of lawsuits based on junk science, LTL sought proper relief through the bankruptcy process. This process is far more efficient in resolving cases than resorting to individual trials in courthouses around the country.
Instead, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals decided that LTL hadn’t reached some arbitrary level of financial distress and returned over 40,000 claimants to an overburdened and inefficient civil justice system. LTL offered its assets to resolve these claims, but the court’s decision seems to penalize the company for doing so. Resolution of these claims will now take decades to complete, at great expense to all parties. The only true winners here are the trial lawyers, who will earn millions in fees and expenses over the next several decades.
It is worth remembering how LTL ended up in this situation to begin with: A pervasive culture of lawsuit abuse and a robust trial-lawyer playbook drove the company to seek bankruptcy protection. The Third Circuit’s opinion is befuddling and likely to cause confusion in other courts, while guaranteeing the trial bar years of lucrative work.
Sherman Joyce
President, American Tort Reform Assn.
Latest News
View all news
ATRA Calls for Veto of S.B. 410 to Protect Michigan’s Economic Future
This shift is not in the best interests of consumers, manufacturers, or the state as a whole
Michigan Legislature Looks to Expand Liability, ATRA Urges Caution
Michigan lawmakers must consider the unintended consequences of expanding liability
Mass Tort Machine Exposed by Trial Lawyer Playbook Report
The Trial Lawyer Playbook report serves as a call to action, promoting transparency, accountability, and fairness in the legal system.
Congressional Hearing on Bankruptcy to Address Mass Tort Litigation
ATRA Reiterates Support for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Use to Address Mass Tort Litigation, Urges Meaningful Dialogue Amid Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing
Climate Lawsuits Don’t Belong In State Courts
By maintaining the clear distinction between the judiciary and policymaking, the court can help us navigate this critical issue with prudence and responsibility, safeguarding a sustainable future for all.
House Oversight Hearing on Third-Party Litigation Financing Applauded by ATRA
The lack of oversight and transparency around third-party litigation funding threatens the integrity of our legal system