
House Oversight Hearing on Third-Party Litigation Financing Applauded by ATRA
The lack of oversight and transparency around third-party litigation funding threatens the integrity of our legal system
The American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) applauds the House Committee on Oversight and Reform for taking a significant step in addressing lawsuit financing during its hearing today, “Unsuitable Litigation: Oversight of Third-Party Litigation Funding,” scheduled to begin at 10 a.m.
“We commend the House Committee on Oversight and Reform for taking the initiative to highlight the impact of third-party litigation financing on our civil justice system today,” ATRA President Tiger Joyce said. “Litigation financing has become a significant driving force behind mass tort litigation, and the lack of oversight and transparency around funding threatens the integrity of our legal system.”
Mass tort litigation has evolved into a multi-billion-dollar enterprise for plaintiffs’ lawyers, who frequently target manufacturers across various industries. Third-party litigation financing (TPLF) is one driver of the mass tort machine that has rapidly grown in recent years, posing unique implications for the fairness and efficiency of our civil justice system.
The role that third-party investors play in financing litigation is of particular concern given the potential to compromise lawyers’ independence when funders can influence litigation or settlement decisions. Undisclosed litigation financing arrangements can complicate the resolution of disputes and obscure conflicts of interest or unethical conduct.
TPLF not only funds litigation but can create it as well. Financing can cover upfront costs for advertising and other services to maximize the number of claims, flooding courts and overwhelming defendants. Courts, litigants, and the public are often unaware of these hidden financial arrangements, further challenging the fairness of the legal process.
As this practice has emerged, ATRA has advocated for transparency in TPLF agreements. Disclosure of such arrangements at the outset of litigation or upon entering a funding agreement would provide parties and courts with vital information to assess the influence of funders on the litigation.
“We appreciate the Committee’s willingness to address third-party litigation financing,” Joyce said. “We hope this spotlight will spur action to ensure transparency in third-party litigation financing agreements, thus safeguarding the fairness of our civil justice system.”
ATRA submitted a letter of testimony to the Committee citing further concerns and problems that have come from third-party litigation financing and also has published a detailed report outlining these concerns, “The Hidden Money Behind the Litigation: The Problematic Expansion of Third Party Litigation Funding.”
Latest News
View all news
Congressional Hearing on Bankruptcy to Address Mass Tort Litigation
ATRA Reiterates Support for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Use to Address Mass Tort Litigation, Urges Meaningful Dialogue Amid Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing
Climate Lawsuits Don’t Belong In State Courts
By maintaining the clear distinction between the judiciary and policymaking, the court can help us navigate this critical issue with prudence and responsibility, safeguarding a sustainable future for all.
House Oversight Hearing on Third-Party Litigation Financing Applauded by ATRA
The lack of oversight and transparency around third-party litigation funding threatens the integrity of our legal system
Georgia Legislature Needs to Address Lawsuit Abuses
Together, let’s forge a legal landscape that makes equitable access to justice a living reality for all Georgians.
Private Attorneys Hired by State Should Not Reap a Windfall at Taxpayers’ Expense
This is an opportunity to reassess the practices and regulations surrounding private-attorney contracting and to enact reforms that promote fairness, transparency and value for taxpayer dollars.
ATRA Applauds 4th Circuit’s Denial of En Banc Review in Bestwall Litigation
Allowing the company to continue the bankruptcy process will help ensure equitable and efficient resolution in complex mass tort claims