RFK Jr.’s Trial Lawyer Ties Raise Red Flags
We must ensure that all future health decisions are made with the best interests of all Americans in mind — not the financial motives of profit-seeking plaintiffs’ lawyers.
(La., filed May 20, 2024): Urging the court to not overturn their previous decision in the case. Arguing that the Court’s original decision was not based upon policy, and it correctly interpreted the Louisiana Constitution as prohibiting the legislative revival of prescribed claims. Also arguing that the court’s original decision correctly identified the doctrine of contra non valentem as an available avenue of redress. The court’s original decision provided predictability for the availability and affordability of insurance in a state presently facing an insurance crisis.
Status: In June, the Court overturned its previous decision and upheld the statute as constiutional.
We must ensure that all future health decisions are made with the best interests of all Americans in mind — not the financial motives of profit-seeking plaintiffs’ lawyers.
Proposed Reforms Aim to Slash $1,372 Annual ‘Tort Tax’ for Every Georgian
Nuclear Verdicts® and Insurance Fraud Plague State’s Legal System
New Report Ranks Seattle-Area Courts Among Worst in US
$1,046/Person ‘Tort Tax’ — Court Expands Liability, Michiganders Pay
Courts Threaten Preemie Formula Access, Residents Pay $1,475/Person/Year ‘Tort Tax’