Carl v. Johnson & Johnson
(N.J., filed October 5, 2020): Urging the New Jersey Supreme Court to review a lower court’s incorrect application of the state’s expert evidence standard. Arguing that the Court needs to overturn the decision to reinforce the message of its opinion in In re Accutane. The opinion, if not reversed, will leave trial courts with great uncertainty as to the gatekeeping role in New Jersey’s many drug, tort and product lawsuits.
Latest News
View all news
California Ranks No. 3 on Judicial Hellholes® List
Report Reveals Ongoing Crisis and Urgent Need for Reform
Kentucky Emerges on Judicial Hellholes® Watch List for the First Time
Evolution in Legal Landscape and Emerging Challenges Highlighted
Justice on Trial as St. Louis Ranks No. 8 in 2023-2024 Judicial Hellholes® Report, Urging Reform
St. Louis’ Legal Woes Exposed as Trial Lawyer Contributions Stall Reform
Louisiana Grapples with Judicial Hellholes® Distinction
From Coasts to Courts, State Struggles Under Weight of Judicial Hellholes® Title
Cook County, Illinois Rises to Second-Worst Judicial Hellhole® in Latest Report
Cook County Legal Woes Exposed: No-Injury Lawsuits, Excessive Verdicts, Business Struggles
Florida No Longer a Judicial Hellhole®, Named Point of Light in Annual Report
St. Louis’ Legal Woes Exposed as Trial Lawyer Contributions Stall Reform