Chrysler Group v. Walden

|

(Ga., filed August 31, 2017): Arguing the lower court erred by admitting CEO pay evidence because it creates extreme unfair prejudice and provokes a jury response based on passion and prejudice.  Also, arguing that considering the damages award only in isolation prevents a meaningful analysis for excursiveness.

Court ruled against ATRA's position

Status: On March 15, 2018, the court disagreed with ATRA’s position and affirmed the punitive damages award.

Latest News

View all news

Transparency in Tort Reform

This letter-to-the-editor was originally published by the Tampa Bay Times in response to their March 13, 2023 article “Florida lawmakers want to help insurance companies by limiting lawsuits.“ The “tort […]