Dziadek v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company


(8th Cir., Filed Feb. 21, 2017): Arguing that above-market prejudgment interest should not be included in the denominator when calculating the ratio of punitive to compensatory damages.  Above-market prejudgment interest overstates the actual harm suffered by the plaintiff and already serves a punitive function.  If the Court concludes that some amount of prejudgment interest should be included in the denominator of the ratio, it should use a market rate for determining the amount and add the balance of the prejudgment interest- the effect of which is entirely punitive-to the numerator.

Court ruled against ATRA's position

On August 15, 2017, the court ruled against ATRA’s position and affirmed the award of punitive damages. 

Latest News

View all news

More Work Remains on Tort Reform

This letter-to-the-editor was originally published by The Herald-Dispatch in Huntington, WV. West Virginia was a mainstay on the American Tort Reform Foundation’s “Judicial Hellholes®” list for nearly 20 years, finally […]