Ford Motor Co. v. Walker

|

(Co., filed August 18, 2021): Arguing the procedural sequence presented recurs and justifies clarification of the post-judgment interest calculation.  The Court of Appeals interpretation relies on illusions and produces a distinction that has no rational justification. The existence of a rational basis for calculating postjudgment interest using a variable rate depends on including successful appeals vacating judgments for new trials. 

 

View Amicus Brief

Court ruled in favor of ATRA's position

Latest News

View all news