Gilead Tenofovir Cases, Gilead Sciences v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
(Ca., filed March 13, 2024): Urging the court to review the lower court’s decision to adopt an innovative theory of liability. The California Court of Appeal created a new duty to innovate. It significantly expanded product liability finding that even if a product is not defective or unreasonably dangerous, a company can be held liable if it was researching and developing another product that it “knew” was “safer” and did not release it fast enough.
Latest News
View all news
“Too Anti-Business for New York”: ATRA Calls on Illinois Gov. Pritzker to Veto SB 328
Experts say bill would allow out-of-state lawsuits in Illinois courts, threaten 208,000 jobs, and spark constitutional challenge
Gov. Landry’s Last-Minute Amendment to Worsen Lawsuit Abuse
Retroactive Changes Would Expose Businesses to New Liabilities, Cost Jobs, Damage Business Climate
ATRA Condemns Last-Minute Push for SB 26, Warns Illinois Lawmakers: “This Is One of the Worst Bills of the Year”
SB 26 Would Expand Court Jurisdiction, Drive Away Businesses, and Raise Costs for Residents
ATRA Applauds Gov. DeSantis’s Veto of H.B. 6017, Preserving Florida’s Civil Justice Progress
Lawmakers Urged to Resist Trial Bar’s Pressure to Expand Liability
MAHA Report to “Make Our Children Healthy Again” Likely Ammo for Trial Bar
ATRA Warns of Potential Litigation Onslaught Under Trial Lawyer RFK, Jr.’s Leadership
ATRA Praises Texas Lawmakers for Moving Meaningful Tort Reform
SB 30 Aims to Lower Costs, Support Job Growth