The Lab Whose Junk Science Is Fueling a Frenzy of Litigation
Legitimate consumer protection demands sound science and impartial analysis — not distorted data designed to manufacture lawsuits.
(U.S., filed September 1, 2021): Supporting the petition for certiari. Arguing that the Court should resolve the conflicting constructions of the Daubert standard. Consistent nationwide evidentiary standards are essential, particularly in the mass tort context. The Ninth Circuit’s approach to Daubert for medical causation conflicts with other circuits, and leads to peculiar results. Also arguing that the Court should grant certiorari to address the court of appeals’ anomalous preemption ruling. Uniformity in federal preemption—both under FIFRA and beyond—is an issue of immense importance to regulated businesses operating nationwide. The decision below disrupts uniformity, misapplies Bates, and brings confusion to the interpretation of identical preemption language.
Legitimate consumer protection demands sound science and impartial analysis — not distorted data designed to manufacture lawsuits.
Law Firms Spent $168M+ on 2.2M Ads in Georgia
ATRA’s Latest Studies Reveal Financial Influence and Lack of Transparency in Pennsylvania’s Campaign Finance Systems
Two New Reports Analyze Legal Services Advertising Trends and Campaign Contributions
Two New Reports Unveil Disturbing Trends in Legal Services Advertising and Plaintiffs’ Firms’ Political Contributions
In-depth analysis unveils trial lawyers’ staggering advertising and political spending, exposing tactics used to shape public opinion and legal outcomes.