The Louisiana Supreme Court’s Alarming U-turn
The Pelican State deserves a judicial system that stands firmly on principles — not one swayed by the most recent political winds.
(N.M., filed January 26, 2023): Arguing that the pure “steam of commerce” theory conflicts with U.S. Supreme Court Precedent requiring purposeful availment and subverts the values of fairness and federalism underlying the doctrine of specific jurisdiction. Adopting the pure “stream of commerce” theory will impose needless costs and uncertainty on businesses throughout the nation.
The Pelican State deserves a judicial system that stands firmly on principles — not one swayed by the most recent political winds.
Judges must recognize these cases for what they are: a cynical attempt to turn the suffering of families into a litigation jackpot.
A recent Delaware case shows that not all states follow the Supreme Court’s 1993 Daubert ruling.
Republican Candidate Derek Brown Urged to Sign Pledge
Maryland taxpayers should be assured that state leadership is working in their best interests and not those of entrepreneurial trial lawyers.
ATRA Declares State a ‘Lawsuit Inferno’ Amid Liability Onslaught