“Too Anti-Business for New York”: ATRA Calls on Illinois Gov. Pritzker to Veto SB 328
Experts say bill would allow out-of-state lawsuits in Illinois courts, threaten 208,000 jobs, and spark constitutional challenge
Rost v. Ford
(Penn., filed in January of 2015): Arguing that a plaintiff in an asbestos action cannot satisfy the burden of establishing substantial-factor causation by an expert’s ‘cumulative exposure’ theory that the expert concedes is simply an ‘any exposure’ theory by a different name. Also arguing that the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas’ mandatory practice of consolidating unrelated asbestos cases—even where the defendants suffer severe prejudice as a result—is inconsistent with the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure and due process.
Court ruled against ATRA’s position on November 22, 2016.
Latest News
View all news
Gov. Landry’s Last-Minute Amendment to Worsen Lawsuit Abuse
Retroactive Changes Would Expose Businesses to New Liabilities, Cost Jobs, Damage Business Climate
ATRA Condemns Last-Minute Push for SB 26, Warns Illinois Lawmakers: “This Is One of the Worst Bills of the Year”
SB 26 Would Expand Court Jurisdiction, Drive Away Businesses, and Raise Costs for Residents
ATRA Applauds Gov. DeSantis’s Veto of H.B. 6017, Preserving Florida’s Civil Justice Progress
Lawmakers Urged to Resist Trial Bar’s Pressure to Expand Liability
MAHA Report to “Make Our Children Healthy Again” Likely Ammo for Trial Bar
ATRA Warns of Potential Litigation Onslaught Under Trial Lawyer RFK, Jr.’s Leadership
ATRA Praises Texas Lawmakers for Moving Meaningful Tort Reform
SB 30 Aims to Lower Costs, Support Job Growth