The Louisiana Supreme Court’s Alarming U-turn
The Pelican State deserves a judicial system that stands firmly on principles — not one swayed by the most recent political winds.
The People of the State of Michigan v. Eli Lilly & Co.
(MI., filed May 1, 2024): Arguing that the Michigan Supreme Court correctly decided previous cases based on the plain language of Michigan’s consumer protection statute. The Court held that the MCPA bars lawsuits against companies doing business in Michigan when they are already specifically regulated under other laws and regulations. The principles of stare decisis require retention of the stable, workable precedent of the Court and the precedent strikes the right balance between protecting consumers without overburdening Michigan’s extensively regulated business and service providers.
Latest News
View all news
Trial Lawyers’ Latest Target: Life-Sustaining Baby Formula
Judges must recognize these cases for what they are: a cynical attempt to turn the suffering of families into a litigation jackpot.
Wall Street Journal: Junk Science Sometimes Still Prevails in Court
A recent Delaware case shows that not all states follow the Supreme Court’s 1993 Daubert ruling.
ATRA Applauds Utah AG Candidate Rudy Bautista for Signing Transparency Pledge
Republican Candidate Derek Brown Urged to Sign Pledge
Baltimore’s Opioid Lawsuit Is Wrong Approach to Overdose Crisis
Maryland taxpayers should be assured that state leadership is working in their best interests and not those of entrepreneurial trial lawyers.
ATRA Sounds Alarm on Colorado’s ‘Lawsuit Inferno’ in New Report
ATRA Declares State a ‘Lawsuit Inferno’ Amid Liability Onslaught