Problem

The American Law Institute (ALI) was traditionally an independent, scholarly institution but now participates more in advocacy, proposing novel liability expansion.

The ALI has proposed numerous restatements in recent years that go beyond simply restating an established area of common law but instead proposing rules to advance particular policy agendas. 

Recent problematic proposed restatements include:

  • Restatement of the Law, Consumer Contracts
  • Restatement of Torts, Third: Concluding Provisions

ATRA's Position:

ALI’s mission appears to have shifted over the past decade from that of a scholarly institution that was safely above the fray in broader policy disputes, to that of an advocacy group proposing novel expansions in liability law.  The organization has chosen to leverage its standing and influence more aggressively in the legal community to pursue legal advocacy.


Opposition Opinion:

Over the past decade, ALI has shifted to an advocacy organization expanding liability in a variety of areas. Rather than developing Restatements that assist judges by clarifying the law, the ALI is maneuvering to reinvent law. 

Secondary Sources / American Law Institute – S.B. 775

Missouri|2022

Provides that a secondary source (such as ALI Restatements) including

[…]

Provides that a secondary source (such as ALI Restatements) including a legal treatise, scholarly publication, textbook, or other explanatory text, does not constitute the law or public policy of Missouri to the extent its adoption would create, eliminate, expand, or restrict a cause of action, right, or remedy, or to the extent it is inconsistent with, or in conflict with, or otherwise not addressed by, Missouri statutory law or Missouri appellate case law precedent.


[hide]

Unchallenged

Secondary Sources / Insurance – H.B. 2272

Arizona|2022

Provides that a secondary source on insurance (such as an

[…]

Provides that a secondary source on insurance (such as an ALI Restatement), including any legal treatise, scholarly publication, textbook or other explanatory text, does not constitute the law or public policy of Arizona and is not authoritative if the secondary source purports to create, eliminate, expand or restrict a cause of action, right or remedy or if it conflicts with any of the following: the United States Constitution or the Arizona Constitution, state law, state case law precedent, or other common law that may have been adopted by Arizona.


[hide]

Unchallenged