Appeal Bond Reform

Problem

In an era when billion-dollar verdicts are no longer uncommon, appealing a jury verdict can force an individual, a company, or an industry into bankruptcy.

ATRA's Position:

ATRA supports appeal bond reform legislation that limits the size of an appeal bond when a company is not liquidating its assets or attempting to flee from justice.


Opposition Opinion:

The personal injury bar’s argument in support of appeal bonds – that appeal bonds secure damages awards owed to a plaintiff – fails to address the hardship imposed by the bonds on defendants who are forced to choose between risking bankruptcy by posting billion-dollar bonds, many of which are ultimately overturned by an appellate court, and forfeiting their right to appeal.

Appeal Bond Reform: H.B. 1529 (2016)

Mississippi|2016

Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay

[…]

Limits the amount a defendant can be required to pay to secure the right to appeal to 50 percent of an appellant’s net worth not to exceed $35 million.


[hide]

Unchallenged

Appeal Bond Reform: Rule 8 (2001)

Mississippi|2001

By rule, the Mississippi Supreme Court imposed a limit on

[…]

By rule, the Mississippi Supreme Court imposed a limit on the amount that defendants can be required to post to secure a bond to appeal a punitive damages award to the lesser of: (1) 125 percent of the judgment; (2) 10 percent of the defendants net worth; or (3) $100 million.


[hide]

Unchallenged