Medical Liability Reform

Problem

In state civil justice systems that lack reasonable limits on liability, multi-million dollar jury awards and settlements in medical liability cases have forced many insurance companies to either leave the market or substantially raise costs.  Increasingly, physicians in these states are choosing to stop practicing medicine, abandon high-risk parts of their practices, or move their practices to other states. 

ATRA's Position:

To help bring a degree of predictability and fairness to the civil justice system that is critical to solving the growing medical access and affordability crisis, ATRA recommends a medical liability reform packages that includes: (1) a $250,000 limit on noneconomic damages; (2) a sliding scale for attorney’s contingent fees; (3) periodic payment of future damages; and (4) abolition of the collateral source. 


Opposition Opinion:

The personal injury bar likes to argue that only insurance companies are to blame for the current medical liability crisis.  Pointing to significant declines in the stock market, they blame insurance companies for raising rates to make up for allegedly irresponsible investing practices.  But market fluctuations cannot fully explain the sharp increases in medical liability insurance pricing, especially since insurance companies invest only 13% of their total investments in stocks.  A better explanation of why insurance companies have raised rates is that they have had to cover the cost of increased claim payments, which have risen almost three times the rate of inflation in recent years.

Medical Liability Reform- Emergency Medical Situations: S.B. 3 (2005)

Georgia|2005

Provided that in claims arising out of the provision of

[…]

Provided that in claims arising out of the provision of emergency medical care against a hospital emergency department, no physician or health care provider shall be liable unless it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the physician or health care provider’s actions showed gross negligence.


[hide]

Unchallenged

Expressions of Sympathy: S.B. 3 (2005)

Georgia|2005

Provided that expressions of sympathy, regret, apology, etc. by healthcare

[…]

Provided that expressions of sympathy, regret, apology, etc. by healthcare providers are inadmissible as evidence and shall not constitute an admission of liability.


[hide]

Unchallenged

“Good Samaritan” Law: H.B. 89 (2008)

Georgia|2008

Provides businesses and non-profits some liability protection when performing acts

[…]

Provides businesses and non-profits some liability protection when performing acts in a time of emergency or crisis in coordination with a state agency.


[hide]

Unchallenged