Medical Liability Reform

Problem

In state civil justice systems that lack reasonable limits on liability, multi-million dollar jury awards and settlements in medical liability cases have forced many insurance companies to either leave the market or substantially raise costs.  Increasingly, physicians in these states are choosing to stop practicing medicine, abandon high-risk parts of their practices, or move their practices to other states. 

ATRA's Position:

To help bring a degree of predictability and fairness to the civil justice system that is critical to solving the growing medical access and affordability crisis, ATRA recommends a medical liability reform packages that includes: (1) a $250,000 limit on noneconomic damages; (2) a sliding scale for attorney’s contingent fees; (3) periodic payment of future damages; and (4) abolition of the collateral source. 


Opposition Opinion:

The personal injury bar likes to argue that only insurance companies are to blame for the current medical liability crisis.  Pointing to significant declines in the stock market, they blame insurance companies for raising rates to make up for allegedly irresponsible investing practices.  But market fluctuations cannot fully explain the sharp increases in medical liability insurance pricing, especially since insurance companies invest only 13% of their total investments in stocks.  A better explanation of why insurance companies have raised rates is that they have had to cover the cost of increased claim payments, which have risen almost three times the rate of inflation in recent years.

Health Care Malpractice Act: S.B. 145 (2010)

Utah|2010

Created a statute of repose that requires all claims to

[…]

Created a statute of repose that requires all claims to be brought within 10 years or they are barred.  Placed limitations on noneconomic damages of $350,000 for causes of action arising after May 15, 2010.  Required an affidavit of merit from a health care professional in order to proceed with an action, if they received a non-meritorious finding from the pre-litigation panel.  Limited the liability of a health care provider, in certain circumstances, for the acts or omissions of an ostensible agent.


[hide]

Unchallenged

Medical Liability Reform: Arbitration: H.B. 135 (2013)

Utah|2013

Provides that a party in a medical liability action or arbitration

[…]

Provides that a party in a medical liability action or arbitration may not attempt to allocate fault to any health care provider unless a certificate of compliance has been issued.  Also, requires that evidence from a medical review panel remain unreportable to a health care facility or health insurance plan.


[hide]