Medical Liability Reform

Problem

In state civil justice systems that lack reasonable limits on liability, multi-million dollar jury awards and settlements in medical liability cases have forced many insurance companies to either leave the market or substantially raise costs.  Increasingly, physicians in these states are choosing to stop practicing medicine, abandon high-risk parts of their practices, or move their practices to other states. 

ATRA's Position:

To help bring a degree of predictability and fairness to the civil justice system that is critical to solving the growing medical access and affordability crisis, ATRA recommends a medical liability reform packages that includes: (1) a $250,000 limit on noneconomic damages; (2) a sliding scale for attorney’s contingent fees; (3) periodic payment of future damages; and (4) abolition of the collateral source. 


Opposition Opinion:

The personal injury bar likes to argue that only insurance companies are to blame for the current medical liability crisis.  Pointing to significant declines in the stock market, they blame insurance companies for raising rates to make up for allegedly irresponsible investing practices.  But market fluctuations cannot fully explain the sharp increases in medical liability insurance pricing, especially since insurance companies invest only 13% of their total investments in stocks.  A better explanation of why insurance companies have raised rates is that they have had to cover the cost of increased claim payments, which have risen almost three times the rate of inflation in recent years.

Medical Liability Reform- Frivolous Lawsuits: H.B. 2292 (2006).

Washington|2006

Provided that an attorney filing a claim must certify that

[…]

Provided that an attorney filing a claim must certify that to the best of the party’s or attorney’s knowledge, the claim is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or good faith arguments.  If an attorney is found in violation of this rule, the court may impose an appropriate sanction to include an order to pay defendant costs, including a reasonable attorney fee.


[hide]

Challenged and Struck Down

DeYoung v. Providence Med. Ctr., 960 P.2d 919 (Wash. 1998)

Medical Liability Reform- Collateral Source Rule: H.B. 2292 (2006)

Washington|2006

Provided for the admissibility of evidence that the plaintiff has

[…]

Provided for the admissibility of evidence that the plaintiff has already been compensated for the injury from any source except for the assets of the plaintiff, plaintiff’s representative, or the plaintiff’s immediate family.  Plaintiff may also present evidence of an obligation to repay any compensation.


[hide]

Unchallenged