Dangerous Instrumentality Reform: S.B. 862 (2019)
Provides that the lessor of special mobile equipment that causes
Provides that the lessor of special mobile equipment that causes injury, death, or damage while leased under a lease agreement is not liable for the acts of the lessee or lessee’s agent or employee if the lease agreement requires documented proof of insurance coverage with limits of at least $250,000/$500,000 for bodily injury liability and $100,000 for property damage liability, or at least $750,000 for combined property damage liability and bodily injury liability. Provides that the failure of the lessee to maintain insurance coverage required by the lease agreement does not impose liability on the lessor. Special mobile equipment are vehicles not designed or used primarily to transport persons or property and that are only incidentally operated or moved over a highway. Examples include ditch digging apparatus, well-boring apparatus, and road construction and maintenance machinery, draglines, self-propelled cranes and earthmoving equipment. The bill responds to the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Newton v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation, which found that a loader is a dangerous instrumentality and thus subject to Florida’s dangerous instrumentality doctrine. The dangerous instrumentality doctrine imposes “strict vicarious liability upon the owner of a motor vehicle who voluntarily entrusts that motor vehicle to an individual whose negligent operation causes damage to another.”
Latest News
View all news
Monsanto’s triumph over junk science
Defense attorneys turn the tables by exposing massive conflicts of interest
The nation’s oldest attorney general organization is broken — here is how to fix it
This op-ed was originally published by the Washington Examiner. When the National Association of Attorneys General was founded in 1907, its goal was to support the top law enforcement officer […]
When Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Mislead the Public
Massive television ad buys and public relations campaigns that peddle misinformation taint public’s preconceptions, while judges fail to restrict falsehoods in their courtrooms.
$34M+ Spent on Lawyer Ads in Top California Media Markets So Far In 2022
New study shows Roundup, talc and paraquat top ad targets in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Sacramento
State AGs Call on National Org to Return Funds to States
The National Association of Attorneys General sits on $280M in assets
Third Circuit Can Uphold Reasonable Use of ‘Texas-Two-Step’ Law
This op-ed was originally published by Real Clear Policy. Historically, courts have respected the view that filing for bankruptcy is a well-recognized way for a business to respond when the […]