Product Liability Reform: SB 2805 (1987).

|

Provides that a manufacturer or seller of a product is

Provides that a manufacturer or seller of a product is liable only if the plaintiff proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the product was not suitable or safe because it: (1) deviated from the design specifications or performance standards; (2) failed to contain adequate warnings; or (3) was designed in a defective manner.  Provides that a manufacturer or seller is not liable if at the time the product left the manufacturer’s control there was not available a practical and feasible alternative design that would have prevented the harm.  Provides that a product’s design is not defective if the harm results from an inherent characteristic of the product that is known to the ordinary person who uses or consumes it.  Provides that a manufacturer or seller is not liable for a design defect if the harm results from an unavoidably unsafe aspect of a product and the product was accompanied by an adequate warning.  Provides that the state of the art provision does not apply if the court makes all of the following determinations: (1) that the product is egregiously unsafe; (2) that the user could not be expected to have knowledge of the product’s risk; and (3) that the product has little or no usefulness.  Provides that a manufacturer or seller in a warning‑defect case is not liable if an adequate warning is given.  (An adequate warning is one that a reasonably prudent person in the similar circumstances would have provided.)  Establishes a rebuttable presumption that a government (FDA) warning is adequate.

Related Issues

View all Issues

Latest News

View all news