Product Liability Reform: SB 4 (1993).
Requires proof of an economically and technologically feasible safer alternative
Requires proof of an economically and technologically feasible safer alternative design available at the time of manufacture in most product liability actions for defective design. Provides a defense for manufacturers and sellers of inherently unsafe products that are known to be unsafe. Establishes a fifteen‑year statute of repose for product liability actions against manufacturers or sellers of manufacturing equipment. Provides protection for innocent retailers and wholesalers.
New Poll Finds Strong Bipartisan Support for Government Action vs. Litigation When it Comes to Handling the COVID-19 Pandemic
While COVID-19 relief efforts stall in Congress, public support for aid to small businesses and others impacted by the pandemic remains high. According to a new survey released today by […]
Missouri Supreme Court declines to review billion-dollar award against Johnson & Johnson baby powder
Juliette Fairley of the St. Louis Record reports on the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision not to review a $2 billion verdict.
ATRA President Tiger Joyce penned an op-ed for Law360 on the surge of COVID-19-related lawsuits targeting the insurance industry.
ATRA praises the passage of HB 6030 in Michigan, enacting COVID-19 liability protections.
ATRA’s statement on the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s ruling in Hammons v. Ethicon to allow an out-of-state lawsuit to continue, openly defying SCOTUS precedent.