South Carolina Governor Rallies Support for Key Legal Reform Package
Following Press Conference, S.B. 244 Set for Senate Floor Debate and Vote
States have been debating the merits of enacting new state
States have been debating the merits of enacting new state False Claims Acts (FCAs), or broadening existing ones, largely in response to a federal mandate included in the 2005 federal Deficit Reduction Act. The 2005 mandate dictates that to have a federally qualified FCA, the state must have a whistleblower provision targeted at Medicaid-related fraud that is at least as generous to whistleblowers as the federal civil FCA, which gives the whistleblowers up to 30% of recoveries. If a state enacts such a false claims act, the federal government will give states 10% more of the awards in cases brought under those laws.
A few states quickly passed laws to meet these standards, but most have taken a more careful and cautious look. These states want to know if the federal “deal” is worth it, both financially and in their ability to fight and deter fraud. To date, most states have not adopted these changes. This paper explains why this decision is sound from the perspectives of both economics and public policy.
Following Press Conference, S.B. 244 Set for Senate Floor Debate and Vote
Proposed Appeal Bond Cap Hike Threatens Fairness and Business Climate, ATRA Says
New Report from the American Tort Reform Association Exposes Dangers of Aggressive Legal Services Advertising
ATRA Applauds Passage of S.B. 68 to Address Phantom Damages, Jury Anchoring, Seat Belt Evidence Admissibility
Legislation Addresses Unfair Fault Allocation, Provides Juries with More Relevant Information
Marylanders’ Annual $1,731 ‘Tort Tax’ May Increase with Proposed Changes in Annapolis